tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2499715909956774229.post746848265704022072..comments2024-03-22T22:37:02.639-07:00Comments on Stephen Williamson: New Monetarist Economics: APK On the WarpathStephen Williamsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01434465858419028592noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2499715909956774229.post-38725732501187832722013-08-21T13:37:38.260-07:002013-08-21T13:37:38.260-07:00People are interesting, aren't they? You could...People are interesting, aren't they? You could spend a lifetime backing out those preferences, I think.Stephen Williamsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01434465858419028592noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2499715909956774229.post-1962434952777681712013-08-21T13:01:56.312-07:002013-08-21T13:01:56.312-07:00What is Krugman's utility function ? He appea...What is Krugman's utility function ? He appears to be extremely egotistic, and chooses his positions to ensure he gets as much attention as possible. I dont know if he really believes anything. Lucas and Sargent on the other hand do genuinely seem to care about science.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2499715909956774229.post-13221609283088761142013-08-21T09:38:47.013-07:002013-08-21T09:38:47.013-07:00The libertarian son-in-law is the one I love.The libertarian son-in-law is the one I love.APKnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2499715909956774229.post-53621379345701461452013-08-21T07:14:13.572-07:002013-08-21T07:14:13.572-07:00I would not say that. His finance papers are quite...I would not say that. His finance papers are quite straightforward and mostly very good. The problem is his other persona, the remarkably dense libertarian son-in-law."O" Anonimohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07896236826318022479noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2499715909956774229.post-10916964079360539392013-08-21T06:39:47.613-07:002013-08-21T06:39:47.613-07:00I agree that Cochrane is "remarkably dense.&q...I agree that Cochrane is "remarkably dense." His papers are impenetrable. Way too mathy.APKnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2499715909956774229.post-41079444555491842912013-08-21T06:37:22.890-07:002013-08-21T06:37:22.890-07:00Tell that to Williamson, please. He needs to get o...Tell that to Williamson, please. He needs to get off my back about preferences, endowments, technology, and all thus structural nonsense.APKnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2499715909956774229.post-37023878123169895062013-08-21T03:59:14.378-07:002013-08-21T03:59:14.378-07:00Você tá até aqui também, "O" anônimo ?
...Você tá até aqui também, "O" anônimo ?<br /><br />HUEHUE BR BRAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2499715909956774229.post-69936783980504913472013-08-21T01:12:44.160-07:002013-08-21T01:12:44.160-07:00I second that.I second that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2499715909956774229.post-53971456562015239312013-08-20T22:14:21.189-07:002013-08-20T22:14:21.189-07:00I loved it when Krugman called Cochrane "rema...I loved it when Krugman called Cochrane "remarkably dense". I mean, Cochrane has tried very hard to earn that epitaph."O" Anonimohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07896236826318022479noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2499715909956774229.post-82103879477853527792013-08-20T22:00:41.919-07:002013-08-20T22:00:41.919-07:00Awesome.Awesome.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com